1. The court ruled that the evidence presented was inadmissible due to improper handling.
2. The witness's testimony was deemed inadmissible because it lacked credibility.
3. The lawyer argued for the inadmissibility of the video footage as it was obtained illegally.
4. The judge declared the document inadmissible as it was not properly authenticated.
5. The defendant's motion to suppress the evidence on the grounds of inadmissibility was denied.
6. The prosecutor objected to the defense attorney's attempt to introduce hearsay evidence on the basis of inadmissibility.
7. The jury was instructed to disregard the statement made by the witness as it was deemed inadmissible.
8. The court's decision to exclude the expert testimony was based on its inadmissibility.
9. The judge ruled in favor of the defense's motion to declare the confession inadmissible.
10. The defense attorney successfully argued for the inadmissibility of the witness's statement, leading to a mistrial.